Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOCHOLA, Steven
dc.contributor.authorNamanya, Anaclet Mutiba (supervisor)
dc.contributor.authorBeinebyabo, Adrian (supervisor)
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-17T06:11:04Z
dc.date.available2017-05-17T06:11:04Z
dc.date.issued2015-01
dc.identifier.citationAPAen_US
dc.identifier.other12/MMSPPM/29/081
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12305/117
dc.descriptionA Dissertation Submitted to the School of Management Science In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Award of the Master’s Degree in Management Studies (Project Planning and Management) of Uganda Management Instituteen_US
dc.description.abstractThe study examined the relationship between Determinants and M&E system performance in Trociare funded NGOs in Uganda. Three specific objectives guided the study; (i) To investigate the relationship between human capacity and performance of M&E systems, (ii) To assess the relationship between M&E framework and performance of M&E systems. (iii) To examine the relationship between budgetary allocation and performance of M&E systems. A cross-sectional survey research design employing mixed methods of data collection was used to answers the research questions. A sample of 88 respondents drawn from a population of 90 employees from 10 NGOs was used to collect the data with a response rate of 90.91%. Simple random and purposive sampling techniques were used to select the sample units. Findings indicate that Human capacity was found to explain 35% (Adjusted R square = 0.353) of the variability in M&E system performance and with a strong positive correlation value (r=0.631). The M&E framework was found to explain 27% (Adjusted R square =0.272) of the variability observed in the M&E system performance and with a moderate positive relationship (r=0.539). Budget allocation was found to explain only 9% (Adjusted R square = 0.098) of the variability observed in M&E system performance with a low positive correlation value(r=0.349). It was concluded that the constructs (human capacity, M&E framework and budget allocation) are found to explain the variability in M&E system performance but at different magnitudes. The findings support systems theory. It is recommended that (i) A human capacity Development plan for M&E should be developed, costed and implemented. (ii) Management needs to ensure that all data collected are used in the organization to inform learning, planning and accountabilityen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUganda Management Instituteen_US
dc.subjectMonitoring and Evaluationen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectNon-Governmental Organizationsen_US
dc.titleDeterminants of Monitoring and Evaluation System Performance in Trócaire Funded Non-Governmental Organizations in Uganda.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record