Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmita, Francesca
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-03T07:59:09Z
dc.date.available2020-12-03T07:59:09Z
dc.date.issued2013-01
dc.identifier.citationAmita, Francesca (2013)The Impact of Rewards on Teacher Performance in Uganda: A case study of Secondary schools in Kampala districten_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12305/950
dc.description.abstractThe study investigated the impact of rewards on teacher performance in Uganda The study objectives were: (i) To assess how monetary rewards affect teacher performance in secondary schools in Kampala district. (ii)To examine how nonmonetary rewards affect teacher performance in secondary schools in Kampala district. The study used a case study approach using both a quantitative and qualitative approach on a population of 242 respondents comprising of head teachers, Board of Governors / Trustee members of a selected school,KCCA officials in the education department and teachers, all who were key informants. Data was collected using questionnaires and interview guides. Quantitative data was analyzed using measures of central tendency, correlation and regression analyses while qualitative data was analyzed in a narrative form. Pearson’s correlation coefficient r = 0.501** between monetary rewards and teacher performance suggested that the two variables were related. The r = 0.501** and significance p = 0.000 between monetary rewards and teacher performance suggesting that there was a high positive significant relationship between monetary rewards and teacher performance. This has teacher performance policy implication in that to achieve the desired level of teacher performance, there was need to make teachers basic salary pay, allowances and introduce bonuses equitable based on input-output ratios and industry pay standards in secondary schools. The study also found that using Pearson’s correlation coefficient r = 0.590** between Non monetary rewards and teacher performance suggesting that the two variables were related. The r = 0.590** and significance p = 0.000 between Non monetary rewards and teacher performance suggests that there was a high positive significant relationship between Non monetary rewardsand teacher performance. This has teacher performance policy implication that in order to achieve the desired level of teacher performance, there was need for adequate Non monetary rewards complemented within education service in secondary schools.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUganda Management Instituteen_US
dc.subjectImpacten_US
dc.subjectRewardsen_US
dc.subjectTeacher Performanceen_US
dc.titleThe Impact of Rewards on Teacher Performance in Uganda: A case study of Secondary schools in Kampala districten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record