The Ugandan Journal of Management and Public Policy Studies

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://umispace.umi.ac.ug/handle/20.500.12305/316

The Ugandan Journal of Management and Public Policy Studies is a multidisciplinary Journal publishing a wide range of articles relating to public administration, management, leadership and public policy, from empirical studies and theoretical orientations to practical application. The Journal reviews books, essays, and research notes that are relevant to both scholars, practitioners involved at all levels of administration and management from various organisational forms including business firms, non-governmental organisations and public institutions and individual networks

Browse

Browsing The Ugandan Journal of Management and Public Policy Studies by Author "Alinda, Fred"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Compliance with record-keeping regulatory standards in public procurement in Uganda: Performance challenges and strategic measures for improvement
    (Uganda Management Institute, 2015-03) Alinda, Fred; Mugisa, Geoffrey
    Record-keeping is widely underscored for its crucial role in enhancing transparency, accountability, fostering procurement audits, identifying performance gaps and ultimately improving the delivery of public services. In Uganda, record-keeping in public procurements is highly emphasized and institutionalized. The Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets (PPDA) Act of 2003 and the Local Government Procurement and Disposal of Assets Regulations of 2006 define a regulatory framework for public procurements with the PPDA Authority providing regulatory oversight. The target is to realize 100 percent compliance with record-keeping standards. The accounting officers and the PPDA Authority are charged with the responsibility of ensuring that this target is met. Capacity building has been instituted and continues to be implemented as a key strategic measure to enhance compliance. The Authority conducts periodic compliance assessments to ascertain compliance with the desired regulatory standards inclusive of record-keeping. Availability and completeness of records indicates transparency in public procurements and also determines performance on other indicators that detect adherence to procurement principles of accountability and value for money. Drawing from literature, this article presents an overview on the trend of compliance with recordkeeping standards, vis-a-vis the measures implemented to enhance compliance. From this, the authors establish a persistent and deteriorating state of non-compliance with record-keeping regulatory standards in public procurements over the 2009-2012 period. Non-compliance persists despite the remarkable efforts to build capacity for compliance in the Procurement and Disposing Entities (PDEs). It raises concern over the relevance and quality of training provided to stakeholders. Drawing insights from the Human Capital, Principal Agent and Institutional theories, the authors provide a theoretical perspective in an attempt to account for this persistent non-compliance. Based on the theoretical underpinnings, the study opens insight into critical factors which can be further investigated in an attempt to create a precise account of non-compliance with procurement regulations, particularly with regard to record-keeping standards that are worst affected.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Institutional capacity critical for effective record management towards enhanced transparency and accountability in public procurements
    (Uganda Management Institute, 2016-11) Alinda, Fred; Mugisa, Geofrey
    Enhancing transparency and accountability is widely recognized as an indicator for improved governance and pre-requisite for enhancing service delivery and development. In a bid to promote transparency and accountability in public procurements, Uganda’s Public Procurement system, through the Public procurement and Disposal of Assets Act and the PPDA authority is committed to ensure that all Public Procurement Entities keep records of public procurements to desired regulatory standards. However, poor record keeping has remained persistent in public procurements compromising accountability, transparency and public service delivery. Records are scattered, kept on separate files or different departments. In other cases, they miss completely for some procurements or specific procurement activities. This paper provides empirical evidence in account of this phenomenon. The paper is based on findings from analysis of primary qualitative and quantitative data which was collected from a sample of 76 record management stakeholders in Local Government Procurement and Disposing Entities. The study established prevalence of critical capacity gaps, institutional and technological challenges which constrain record keeping and management in the districts. These are typically institutional capacity challenges which should be addressed looking forwards to improve record keeping for enhanced transparency and accountability in public procurements. The paper finally provides possible measures to address the challenges.